 |
| |
|
New Outlooks In Science & Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 02 April 2008 |
Just my brain |
Today I am showing off a bit. This is what my brain would look like if you were to extract it from my head. It is a nice rendered 3D image of my brain for the left-hand side. I made the picture for a talk about how MRI works I was giving at a school science day this week. However, it is basically a product of an expensive MRI machine, a fast computer and too much time on my part. I suspect it is not the best use of many millions of pounds of medical equipment (though rest assured my brain scans were actually collected for a genuine research project). Though if I could find a 3D printer I think it might make a nice paperweight for my desk. I see a business opportunity here: executive desk toys in the shape of your own brain! Perhaps I should stick to my day job. |
|
| 14 March 2008 |
Random Walks in the brain |
Time for the next installment in the tour through my brain. This time we have an image colelcted using a 'diffusion' technique. What this measures is where water moves during a short time delay. The molecules of water are always in motion, this is can be seen under a microscope as the Brownian motion effect. As the molecules move and bump into each other they follow a 'random walk' - at each collision their direction of travel changes. Overall they will make some gradual progress in one direction, even though the path they have taken is much longer.
If we consider at an instant a collection of water molecules that start in one place. Then look agagin a little time later, what we will see is that they will have spread out in all directions (having all taken complicated 'random walks' to get there). If we now do the same thing, but put the water in a narrow tube, the water molucules are forced to travel mainly along the tube. They will end up only moving in directions up or down the tube.
So what does this have to do with the brain? Well the white matter (see last blog entry) is made of lots of long 'tube-like' fibres. Water can travel along the fibres easily, but it is very hard for it to travel across the fibre wall. However, the grey matter allows water to travel more-or-less in all directions equally. Thus if we can measure where the water travels, or diffuses, we can distingish different bis of the brain.
The image above is what is called a 'Fractional Anisotropic' image. This is a fancy name for a measure between 0 and 1 of how much the diffusion of the water is constrained. So a value of 1 says it can only go one way - along a fibre, whereas 0 says it can go in any direction. So the image really clearly shows up the white matter in my brain.
You might be thinking (if you have ready my last post) that we already separated white and grey matter, so what more does this method tell us? Well diffusion provides more information than just this image. We can, for example, also look at how fast the water moves and so try to spot areas where the brain is damaged. We can also determine the direction the water moves and so work out which way the fibres are going. This last part (which is a bit harder to do) produces some really impressive images of how the brain is wired together. If I can work out how to do the calculations I will show you some of this another time. |
|
| 28 February 2008 |
Colours of my mind |
A week or two ago I was looking at pictures of my brain. This week I have let my computer loose on them, the colourful images above are the result. What my computer has done is remove the skull and other non-brain bits then identify the different types of brain tissue it can see. This time we have a view from above and one from behind cutting through around where my ears are.
Last blog entry I pointed out that in the brain you can see white matter and grey matter. This time the computer has highlighted the different bits using different colours. So the gray matter is now in blue and the white matter in yellow. The green bits are the liquid (mainly water) that surrounds the brain.
You can see that there is lots of white matter - this is made up of lots of long fibers that connect different regions of the brain. The fibers are essentially long tails coming from brain cells and allow different bits of the brain to talk to one another. This is why we might think of it as the wiring of the brain.
We might say that the grey matter is where the work is done, as it is packed full of brain cells. You can see from the pictures that it occupies quite a thin layer and lots of the space is taken up by white matter. The grey matter is basically a sheet of cells approximately 5mm thick, but it is folded up so that you can get a lot in. The folding of the the grey matter is what gives the brain its distinct look, it also makes it relatively easy to get lots of white matter connections between all the different regions.
From my calculations I have roughly 0.8 liters of grey matter volume. Given my crude estimate of thickness above of 5 mm, that gives and area of 0.16 square metres (40 cm by 40 cm) all folded up inside my head. Whether that means I have lots of brain cells or not I don't know. I am sure it is not how much but how you use it that counts!
|
|
| 15 February 2008 |
Great Minds... |
Last time I wrote I was talking about my experiences inside a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanner. This was all in aid of gettting various images of my brain as part of a research project (and not because there is anything wrong with it!)
Now I have been able to get hold of the those images and here is the first one. Isn't it amazing! Without having to take my head apart (something I am not willing to permit) and just by sticking me in big magnet (with various other electronics to hand) it is possible to get a really detailed image of the inside of my head. The resolution is impressive too - each cube that makes up the 3D 'picture' of my brain is just 1mm x 1mm x 1mm. That is about 4 million voxels (the 3D equivalent of pixels in 2D images) to represent my whole head.
I have just given you two slices of my head: one that looks down on me as if you had cut the top off at he level of my forehead. The right-hand picture is as if you were looking from the side and had cuy me in half just to the left of my nose.
So what can you see in these pictures? Well you can see the outline of my head and inside it is a brain (what a relief) and you should be able to sport it is made up of different parts. There is a 'hole' in the middle that is full of fluid, which is connected to the fluid that sits between the outside of the brain and the skull. The brain itself is mainly made of two types of tissue. In lighter grey in these pictures is 'white matter' - this stuff is basically the wiring for the brain so that messages can get from one part to another. The darker grey bits, mainly around the outside, is the 'grey matter' - the stuff that basically contains the brain cells that do all the work.
I am going to ahve a hunt around and see what else I can find out about my brain from the MRI images. Watch this space... |
|
| 03 December 2007 |
Just how strong is an MRI magnet? |
|
Having been an Engineering Neuroscientist (a title of my own invention) for over a year now, it was about time I went in an MRI scanner. In this case to participate in research being done by someone I knew in the lab.
One of the things that has always bothered me about MRI is exactly how strong is the magnet? The main part of the MRI machine is an enourmous great magnet (hence Magnetic Resonance Imaging) - into which you as the patient are put. To get an image of the brain this magnet has to be very strong, but in practice how strong? I can tell you that the magnet I was in is defined as '3 Tesla'. But what does a Tesla mean in reality - how strong doesn that 'feel'?
Well 3T is around 50,000 times stronger than the earth's magnetic field (depending upon where you measure it). That sounds better - 50,000 is a big figure. Although the earth's magnetic field is pretty weak really - what difference does that make to your day to day life? It only really comes into its own with a compass - a light magnet on a pivot. So maybe 3T isn't all that much.
Well evidence of what happens when large metal obejcts get near the scanner provided new light on my question. Have a look at what happens when an oxygen bottle gets near the magnet, or quite a lot of pictures of things sucked into MRI scanners! That is more convincing that an MRI magent is very strong. Though I still dont really have a great feeling of what it means for me - the one who has to go inside it!
Well my scan beings with making sure I dont have any metal on me - watch off, keys and wallet out of pocket (I don't want my bank card wiped) - so clearly these could casue problems. But if I had my keys in my pocket would it really make any difference? Would they be torn from me by the magnet as soon as I entered the room like in the video?? Well I was soon to get some idea.
Once I was all ready to go lying down and being slowly slid into the scanner I noticed that my trousers were not quie so keen to join me. Stopping the process before it became embarassing I soon discovered why. My metal belt buckle was interacting with the magnet (well no duh! - lesson to me to think more carefuly about what metal items I am wearing). My belt was getting caught by the magnet near the edge of the tunnel into the machine. With belt removed (trousers retained BTW) we could proceed with getting pictures of my brain.
So no dramatic flying missiles (thankfuly), but 3T all-in-all seems like a pretty strong magnet to me! |
|
| 20 March 2007 |
Three years hard work to be an expert in fizz... |
|
What have I achieved after studying hard for three years to be called Dr. Chappell? Well at the moment the height of my achievement seems to be an explanation of why there is a violent reaction between metnos and coke (see here ). In some ways I am quite satisifed with this - it is always nice to see something happening and been able to understand and explain what is causing it. In this case I have a sense of achievement knowing that lots of people have come up with various explanations, but my research allows me to sift throught them and work out what is really going on.
However, I get this vague feeling that this cannot have been what three years worth of work was all about. Could I have spent my time better and managed without an intimate knowledge of how fizzy drinks work? Thankful, my research was actually about mroe than just fizzy drinks, as the princicples also apply to the 'bends' in SCUBA divers to. Thus my new found knowledge can be put to good use for safer diving and that makes me feel a bit better! |
|
| 11 December 2006 |
GMTV: the flat pack menace |
|
The self assembly ethos of flat pack furntiure is making its way into the world of toys. Flat pack furniture is famous for having poor instructions and always one bit missing. However, now parents are increasingly finding that the toys they buy for the kids at christmas are getting similarly complex. The great anxiety being: what happens if Dad cannot manage to build it in time for Christmas day? Will flat pack toys ruin Christamses up and down the land?
So today on GMTV myself and two other Engineers from Oxford (Lisa Lazareck and Alistair Hann) set out to see just how hard putting the lastest and greatest toys together is. So could the best educated (not my claim BTW) engineers in the land manage where parents cannot. Well in the half an hour we had - no, we made a good start, but I couldn't assemble a (mini) kitchen in such a short space of time. Of course whether that reflects badly on us or the toy is probably another matter!
Did we completet he job in the end? Yes, we did finish, off camera ,so that the toys could be taken off and given to charity (no we didn't get to keep them). Did we have any bits missing or left over? Oh yes, although that may be the fault of the press department rather than the manufacturer in this case!
The moral of the story? Leave plenty of time to build your childs Christmas present. Someone also asked whether having had 7 years of Engineering study helped me - which I suspect it probably did, although thankfuly I dont do 'flat pack' research probelms! |
|
| 17 October 2006 |
Ready Steady Cook |
|
As a NOISEmaker you never know to whom you will be explaining your science next. In my most recent example it was to Ainsley Harriot and the audience of Ready Steady Cook (or it will be once the program gets on TV).
Both Vicki and myself were invited on the show, so that among all the craziness of cooking a meal in 20 minutes - a job thankfully mostly done by a professional chef - we could talk a bit about science. Like all the NOISE activities we were trying to show that scientists are quite normal people and that science can truly be interesting and not really difficult.
The star of the show (apart from Ainsley) was probably Vicki's experiment - a really neat trick to make marshmallows grow. Sadly the effect isn't permanent, so you cannot get more marshmallow for your money, but illustrates some really simple science, which an easily be done by anyone. Of course if you want to see how its done you will have to watch the show (or cheat and look here).
As for my experience: I had a fantastic time. James Tanner, my chef, produced an enormous quantity of food from very few ingredients almost instantaneously. I had no idea how quick 20 minutes could pass and no idea how James could do so much - even though I was stood right next to him, and not that I really contributed much help!If you have ever wondered: the chefs don't know what food they are getting before the show begins and they only have 20 minutes to cook in - which felt like 5 minutes to me, so must be even worse for them.
Was being on the show worth the effort? I hope so, it is great to think that we don't have to box science into particular 'science' TV shows, but that everyone can take an interest. Hopefully too we can illustrate that science at school can lead to some of the most interesting and varied career options going, or at the very worst it will get you cooking on TV. |
|
| 27 September 2006 |
Away for a day (or two) |
|
I arrived in my job just in time to join my new group on their annual retreat. Which was not (as the name might imply) a couple of days of mutal soul searching and quiet contemplation. Instead it involved each person describing their work and looking for comments/advice/new ideas. It was genuinely interesting to find out about the enourmous variety of differnt research that only 16 people can get up to. Although being new to the subject mweant that I was frequently lost in lists of special terms I hadn't heard before. Thankfuly, being the 'new guy' meant I didn't have to describe my project - which was good, as I am still getting to grips with that myself.
I cannot pretend that the retreat was all hard-core scientific discussion. In fact that only comprised a section of the time, the rest was much more sociable and restful. Except perhps the paintballing. I am not sure whether the best way to get to know those you will be working with is to go around shooting them with pellets of paint, but it worked ! |
|
| 07 September 2006 |
New job |
|
Sarting a new job is just like I remember it felt when I started a new school: you have a certain mixture of apprehension and excitement before you go. You turn up on the first morning and are ushered around the building being shown where everything is - whcih you promply forget and have to keep asking about. Finally you are given various bits of paper and books and shown where to sit and then are not too sure what you are supposed to do next.
The biggest difficulty for me in my new job is that I am moving from a subject I have spent three years doing duing my docotrate to a very different one (more on this in future installments). This means lots of reading, which is very interesting, but after a while I wonder how much more information I can cram into my brain. I am really looking forward to actually doing something practical thoough. My engineering instinct isn't happy until I have made something, or at the very least broken something! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NOISE (New Outlooks In Science & Engineering) is a UK-wide campaign funded by the Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Initiated in 2000, it aims to raise awareness of science and engineering among young people. www.epsrc.ac.uk |
|
| |
|
|
 |